Enterprise Transformation
ERP Implementation Proposal
Emirates Park Zoo & Resort, Abu Dhabi, UAE
Executive Summary
Transformation Vision
"One Platform. One Truth. One Enterprise."
We will implement ERP as the central digital backbone for Emirates Park Zoo & Resort, consolidating 80% of operations while integrating seamlessly with specialized systems.
Key Challenges Identified
Data Silos
No single source of truth across zoo, hotel, and ticketing systems
Manual Procurement
100% manual vendor onboarding, paper LPOs, unenforced policies
Financial Visibility
3-week month-end closing, no real-time budget visibility
Inventory Waste
Perishable feed expired, no batch tracking or cold chain monitoring
Strategic Goals
Governance
Enforce procurement policies, vendor compliance, approval workflows
Visibility
Real-time dashboards for all departments, single version of truth
Cost Reduction
Reduce procurement costs, minimize inventory waste, optimize staffing
Efficiency
Automate manual processes, reduce approval cycles, faster closing
Success KPIs Summary
| KPI Category | Baseline (Current) | Target (Year 1) | Improvement |
|---|---|---|---|
| Month-End Close | 21 days | 5 days | -76% |
| Procurement Cycle Time | 15 days | 5 days | -67% |
| Inventory Accuracy | 70% | 98% | +28% |
| Vendor Compliance Tracking | 0% | 100% | +100% |
| Revenue Leakage | ~3% | <0.5% | -83% |
Current-State Assessment
| Process Area | Current State | Pain Points | Risk Level |
|---|---|---|---|
| Animal Records | Excel spreadsheets per section | No centralized history; duplicate records | High |
| Feeding Schedules | Paper logs, whiteboards | Missed feeds; no consumption tracking | High |
| Enclosure Maintenance | Reactive only | Safety incidents; animal escapes risk | High |
| Staff Rosters | Excel + WhatsApp | Overlapping shifts; no skill-based scheduling | Medium |
| Compliance Records | Paper filing | AZA/Captive breeding compliance at risk | High |
| Process Area | Current State | Pain Points | Risk Level |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Office | WISH.NET PMS | Standalone; no integration with finance | Medium |
| Housekeeping | Paper logs | Linen consumption not tracked | Medium |
| Mini-bar/Restocks | Manual count | Theft; no reconciliation with F&B | Medium |
| Group Bookings | Excel + PMS | Overbooking; rate errors; no contract tracking | High |
| Process Area | Current State | Pain Points | Risk Level |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patient Records | EasyVet | Good system but isolated | Low |
| Medication Inventory | Excel | Expired meds; no reorder alerts | High |
| Procedure Costs | Not tracked | Cannot bill internal departments | High |
| Controlled Drugs | Paper log | Audit risk; no chain of custody | High |
| Process Area | Current State | Pain Points | Risk Level |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ticketing Sales | Galaxy System | Daily sales not posted to finance | High |
| Season Passes | Excel tracking | Revenue recognition errors | High |
| Group Sales | Paper contracts | Lost revenue; no payment tracking | High |
| Visitor Analytics | None | No demographic data; no targeted marketing | Medium |
| Process Area | Current State | Pain Points | Risk Level |
|---|---|---|---|
| General Ledger | Prologic (standalone) | Manual entries from all departments | High |
| Accounts Payable | Email invoices | Lost invoices; duplicate payment risk | High |
| Budgeting | Excel | No real-time control; overspending | High |
| VAT Reporting | Manual calculation | Error risk; penalty exposure | High |
Current System Silos
Risk Assessment Matrix
| Risk Category | Specific Risk | Probability | Impact | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Financial | Revenue leakage from unreconciled tickets | High | High | 16 |
| Operational | Food poisoning from expired inventory | Medium | Critical | 16 |
| Strategic | Decision-making based on outdated data | High | High | 16 |
| Operational | Animal safety incident from missed feed | Low | Critical | 12 |
| Compliance | Breeding program records lost | Medium | High | 12 |
Target Architecture
Digital Backbone Architecture
Integration Strategy
| System | Pattern | Direction | Frequency | Technology |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Galaxy Ticketing | API-based sync | Bidirectional | Real-time / Daily | REST API / Custom Connector |
| WISH.NET PMS | API / Database view | Mostly Inbound | Real-time | REST API / Middleware |
| EasyVet | API / Flat file | Bidirectional | Near real-time | REST API / Custom |
| Biometric System | Database view | Inbound to HR | Hourly | ODBC / Custom Script |
Infrastructure Requirements
Server Specifications
Environments
ERP Modules Blueprint
Finance Module
GL, AP, AR, VAT, Budgeting
Key Features
- Chart of Accounts with hierarchical structure
- UAE VAT management (5%)
- Multi-currency support (AED base)
- Bank reconciliation
- Budget vs actual tracking
Key Reports
Procurement Module
RFQ, PO, Vendor Management
Workflow Steps
Inventory Module
Multi-warehouse, Batch tracking
Warehouse Locations
HR & Payroll Module
WPS-compliant, Leave management
Key Features
- Employee lifecycle management
- Biometric attendance integration
- WPS-compliant payroll
- Training & certification tracking
Maintenance Module
PM schedules, Work orders
Asset Types Managed
Projects Module
CapEx, WBS, Budgeting
Capabilities
- Capital project tracking
- Task management with Gantt charts
- Timesheet integration
- Project profitability analysis
Custom Modules
Animal & Habitat Management
Zoo-specific functionality
Simba
African Lion (Panthera leo) - Male, 6 years
Custom Doctypes
Veterinary Integration
Bi-directional sync with EasyVet for medical records, medication tracking, and treatment costing.
Ticketing Reconciliation
Automated daily sales import from Galaxy, revenue splitting, and settlement reconciliation.
Hotel Revenue Integration
WISH.NET PMS integration for room revenue, occupancy reporting, and linen consumption.
Events & Group Bookings
Corporate bookings, birthday packages, resource allocation, and integrated billing.
Procurement Governance
Approval Threshold Matrix
| Amount (AED) | Quotations Required | Technical Eval | Approver Chain |
|---|---|---|---|
| < 1,000 | 1 verbal | Not required | Requisitioner |
| 1,000 - 5,000 | 1 written | Not required | Dept Head |
| 5,001 - 25,000 | 3 written | Not required | Dept Head + Procurement Mgr |
| 25,001 - 100,000 | 3 written | Required | Dept Head + Proc + Finance |
| 100,001 - 500,000 | Tender (min 5) | Committee | GM + Finance Dir + CEO |
| > 500,000 | Formal Tender | Full Committee | Board Approval |
Vendor Registration Requirements
Required Documents
- Trade License (verified)
- VAT Certificate
- Bank Details (IBAN verified)
- Insurance Certificate
- Company Profile
Compliance Checks
- Document expiry tracking
- TRN validation
- Activity match verification
- Automated expiry alerts
- Performance scoring
Technical Evaluation Scoring
| Criteria | Weight | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Technical Compliance | 30% | 0-100% compliance with specifications |
| Quality Certifications | 15% | ISO, HACCP, etc. |
| Experience & References | 20% | Years in business, reference quality |
| Delivery Capability | 15% | Lead time, location, capacity |
| After-Sales Support | 10% | Warranty, service response |
| Sustainability | 10% | Green practices, waste reduction |
Minimum qualifying score: 70%. Commercial evaluation only among qualified vendors.
Cost Control & Budgeting
Cost Center Hierarchy
Budget Control Points
Alert sent to dept head
Requires Finance review
PR blocked until approval
Daily dashboard updates
Budget vs Actual (Sample - Zoo Department)
| Account | Budget (AED) | Actual (AED) | Variance | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Staff Salaries | 120,000 | 118,500 | +1,500 F | |
| Animal Feed | 45,000 | 48,200 | -3,200 U | |
| Medical Supplies | 12,000 | 11,200 | +800 F | |
| Enclosure Maintenance | 8,000 | 2,500 | +5,500 F | |
| TOTAL | 193,000 | 183,850 | +9,150 F | On Track |
F = Favorable, U = Unfavorable
Reporting & KPIs
Executive Dashboard Preview
February 26, 2026Department KPIs
Zoo Operations
- Feeding Compliance100%
- Health Incidents<5/month
- Mortality Rate<2% annual
Hotel
- Occupancy Rate75%
- ADRAED 450
- Guest Satisfaction4.5/5
F&B Operations
- Food Cost %32%
- Waste %<5%
- Average CheckAED 45
Maintenance
- PM Compliance95%
- MTBF>500h
- MTTR<4h
HR
- Turnover Rate<10%
- Absenteeism<3%
- Training Hours20/year
Procurement
- Cycle Time<5 days
- 3-Quote Compliance100%
- Savings Achieved5%
Data Migration Strategy
Migration Phases
| Phase | Data Type | Timeline | Owner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Phase 1 | Master Data (CoA, Items, Vendors, Customers) | Week 1-2 | Finance / Procurement |
| Phase 2 | Static Data (Employees, Assets, Animals) | Week 3-4 | HR / Maintenance / Zoo |
| Phase 3 | Opening Balances (GL, Inventory, Open POs) | Week 5-6 | Finance |
| Phase 4 | Transactional Historical (1 year summary) | Week 7-8 | All Departments |
| Phase 5 | Live Cutover | Weekend | All |
Go-Live Weekend Schedule
Testing Strategy
Unit Testing
Test individual components/functions by developers in DEV environment
Integration Testing
Test interfaces between modules by tech team
System Testing
End-to-end process testing by implementation team
UAT
Business validation by power users in UAT environment
Performance Testing
Load and stress testing in Pre-PROD
Security Testing
Penetration testing and access control validation
Defect Management
| Severity | Definition | Response Time | Fix Timeframe |
|---|---|---|---|
| P1 - Critical | System down, core function broken | Immediate | < 4 hours |
| P2 - High | Major feature broken, workaround complex | 4 hours | < 24 hours |
| P3 - Medium | Feature works with issues, workaround exists | 24 hours | < 3 days |
| P4 - Low | Cosmetic, minor inconvenience | 3 days | Next release |
Training & Change Management
ADKAR Change Model
Training Timeline
Train the Trainer
- Power User Bootcamp (5 days)
- Practice & Certification
Department Training
- Week 1: Finance, Procurement
- Week 2: HR, Maintenance
- Week 3: Zoo, Veterinary
- Week 4: Hotel, F&B, Retail
Go-Live Prep
- Drop-in sessions, Q&A
- Readiness Assessment
- FINAL GO-LIVE
Go-Live Support Structure
War Room
Days 1-7
On-site functional & technical support
Floor-Walking
Weeks 2-4
Support team visits departments
Business As Usual
Month 2+
Help desk & monthly reviews
Risk Management
Risk Register
| ID | Risk Description | Category | Prob. | Impact | Score | Mitigation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R01 | Integration with Galaxy fails or has data mismatch | Technical | Medium | High | 12 | Early POC, API testing, fallback manual process |
| R04 | Poor data quality in migration | Data | High | High | 16 | Data cleansing, trial migrations, validation rules |
| R06 | Users bypass procurement workflow | Process | High | High | 16 | Policy communication, system enforcement, audits |
| R08 | Resistance to change from staff | People | High | Medium | 12 | Early engagement, champions program, leadership |
| R13 | Data breach or unauthorized access | Security | Low | Critical | 12 | Security architecture, pen testing, RBAC |
| R16 | Scope creep delays timeline | Project | High | Medium | 12 | Change control process, steering committee |
Risk Scoring Matrix
Response Strategies
- Avoid Eliminate the risk by changing approach
- Mitigate Reduce probability or impact
- Transfer Shift risk to third party (insurance, vendor)
- Accept Acknowledge and monitor low-priority risks
Implementation Plan
12-Month Roadmap
Foundation
Months 1-4
- Project Setup & Governance
- Infrastructure Setup
- Finance & Procurement Config
- Vendor Onboarding Module
Core Operations
Months 5-8
- Inventory & Warehouse
- HR & Payroll
- Maintenance & Projects
- Integration Development
Specialized & Go-Live
Months 9-12
- Animal Management Module
- Veterinary Integration
- UAT & Training
- GO-LIVE
Key Milestones
Resource Allocation
| Role | Phase 1 | Phase 2 | Phase 3 | Go-Live |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Project Manager | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| Functional Leads | 100% | 75% | 50% | 75% |
| Technical Architect | 100% | 100% | 100% | 50% |
| Developers | - | 1 FTE | 3 FTE | 1 FTE |
| Integration Specialist | 25% | 50% | 100% | 50% |
| Change Manager | 50% | 75% | 100% | 100% |
Operating Model
Support Model
L1 Support
Service DeskFirst point of contact for all users
- Password resets
- Basic how-to questions
- Initial triage
L2 Support
Power UsersDepartment-specific assistance
- Workflow assistance
- User coaching
- Process guidance
L3 Support
TechnicalIT & ERP Partner specialists
- System administration
- Bug fixes
- Change requests
Service Level Agreements
| Priority | Definition | Response Time | Resolution Time |
|---|---|---|---|
| P1 - Critical | System down for all users | 15 minutes | 4 hours |
| P2 - High | Major function unavailable | 1 hour | 24 hours |
| P3 - Medium | Individual user issue | 4 hours | 3 days |
| P4 - Low | Cosmetic / Enhancement | 24 hours | Next release |
Budget & ROI
Implementation Summary
| Category | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Software Licensing | 34,000 | 34,000 | 34,000 |
| Infrastructure | Included | Included | Included |
| Implementation Services | 200,000 | 0 | 0 |
| Custom Development | 70,000 | 0 | 0 |
| Integrations | 40,000 | 0 | 0 |
| Training | 16,000 | 0 | 0 |
| Change Management | Included | Included | Included |
| Data Migration | 10,000 | - | - |
| Contingency (15%) | 10,000 | 0 | 0 |
| TOTAL | 340,000 | 0 | 0 |
Annual Benefits
| Benefit Area | Calculation | Annual Savings |
|---|---|---|
| Procurement Savings | 15% reduction in maverick spend | AED 200,000 |
| Inventory Waste Reduction | 20% reduction in expired inventory | AED 400,000 |
| Labor Efficiency | 10% reduction in manual effort | AED 300,000 |
| Revenue Leakage Prevention | 1% of revenue recovered | AED 500,000 |
| Duplicate Payment Prevention | 0.5% of AP | AED 100,000 |
| Maintenance Savings | Preventive vs reactive | AED 200,000 |
| Other (Paper, VAT, etc.) | Various | AED 250,000 |
| TOTAL ANNUAL BENEFITS | AED 1,950,000 |
ROI Summary
Conclusion & Recommendation
Why ERP?
Lower TCO
Open source reduces licensing costs by 80% vs proprietary ERP
Flexibility
Custom modules for zoo-specific needs
Scalability
Grows from 200 to 2,000 users
Key Decisions Required
| Decision | Options | Recommendation | Deadline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Project Approval | Approve / Reject / Modify | Approve as proposed | Immediate |
| Budget Allocation | Full / Phased / Reduced | Full Year 1 budget | Immediate |
| Steering Committee | Who will serve? | GM, CFO, COO, Dept Heads | Week 1 |
| Internal Project Lead | Assign resource | Full-time PM from operations | Week 1 |
Final Recommendation
We recommend proceeding with the ERP Enterprise Transformation Program as proposed.
The project pays for itself in less than 2 years and delivers strategic value for decades to come.